MusicDish e-Journal - September 2, 2010
MusicDish Advertising Network
» HOME » INSIDER SCOOP » CAREER TIPS » MUSIC SPOTLIGHT » MUSICDISH*CHINA
» INDUSTRY INTERVIEWS » NEWS BEAT » DIGITAL SKOOL » OPEN REVIEW » MUSICDISH EDELWEISS
Search MusicDish e-Journal (Advanced)
Subscribe To MusicDish e-Journal
About | Contact | Advertise | RSS | Submit Article | Submit News | Artist Development | Premium PR Distribution
Mi2N | MusicDish*China | MusicDish Network | MusicDishTV | Urban Music News Network

Have Labels Bit Off The Hand That Feeds Them?
The New Business Model: Extract Yet More Revenue From Artists
By Anne Freeman, The Aspiring Songwriter®
(more articles from this author)
2006-03-08
Comment | Email | Print | RSS

In recent article in the Nashville-based trade magazine MusicRow, Michael Milom, Esq., an entertainment attorney with Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, observes a "new business model" that the majors and some larger independent labels are implementing to increase their profitability.

In his article, “The Impact of New Business Models on Artists,” Milom identifies five contract strategies now being employed by labels for the purpose of increasing and diversifying label revenue sources, and three contract strategies being employed to increase label profitability from existing revenue sources. Unfortunately, all of these new contract strategies come at the expense of new artists. I've done my best to summarize some of Milom's major points, below:

1. Labels are requiring that they own and control artists’ “official websites” and labels may generate income by selling advertising on the artists' official websites.

Milon adds that labels may also require from artists that the labels be permitted to license and sell label-created merchandise on official artist websites. But, he warns, if and how the artists will participate in these revenue streams is up for negotiation, not a given. Finally, Milon points out that just a few years ago, labels would have been prohibited from such activities in most recording contracts.

2. Labels are requiring control over the licensing of album cover artwork.

Specifically, the labels are requiring that they control licensing for artwork that incorporates the artists’ names and likenesses. Milon points out that the net revenue from licensing deals, which was traditionally a 50-50 split between the label and artist, can now dip to as low as 12 percent for new artists.

3. Labels are requiring that artists pay a portion of their touring and/or merchandise revenue to the record company.

Milon says that the amount of the artists' touring and/or merchandise revenue that labels are now requiring to participate in “varies widely.” However, he reminds us that this is a new contractual requirement that “significantly reduces a source of income that has previously belonged solely to the artist.”

4. Labels are increasing the market for authorized electronic sales and similar electronic revenue sources such as subscription music services - but are decreasing the revenue share for artists.

Milon states that the artists’ revenue share in these cases is often significantly lower than revenue "derived from a comparable sale in CD configuration.” He also states that "many contracts still apply deductions for packaging, free goods and returns reserves in calculating an artist’s royalties from electronic sales even though there are no packaging costs incurred, no free goods offered or return rights granted by the company or its licensee in connection with those sales."

5. Labels are requiring artists to create new products for the mobile communications market, but with no financial renumeration to the artist.

Milon notes that these products are frequently being used for what labels are considering "promotional purposes" and no royalties are paid to the artists. These products include "voice tones," "ring backs" and "electronic wallpaper for computers." The net result: artists are not gaining revenue from this quickly expanding market.

6. Labels are increasing the percentage of record company expenditures that are recoupable from artist.

Milon warns that labels are both increasing percentages of traditional recoupments as well as attempting to “shift other costs traditionally borne by the label to the artist’s side of the ledger.”

QUESTION: Can artists survive this new record label business model?

LABELS: Are you implementing this "new business model?" If so, why? If not, why not?

Call for Papers: Send us your thoughts, observations, experiences to the editor at editor

Read Milon’s full article, “The Impact of New Business Models on Artists," on MusicRow.

For more information and to contact the author, click on the author’s name at the top of the page.


Home » Insider Scoop » Have Labels Bit Off The Hand That Feeds Them?
Permalink:http://www.musicdish.com/mag/?id=10902
Email |Print |Comment |RSS

back | top


MusicDish Advertising Network

Insider Scoop

» How The Music Industry Changed

» iDream Studios And The Day Studio Music Rose Again

» Net Neutrality For Musicians

» Time To Pay the Piper

» Industry Viewpoints: Indian Copyright Act 1958 Revisited

Insider Scoop Directory



» [2010-09-01] NY Times Covers AES NY Section's Electric Lady Studios 40th Anniversary Salute; Over Eighty Music Industry Pro's Were In Attendance, And Thousands Of Viewers Witnessed The Two-hour+ Event

» [2010-09-01] How The Music Industry Changed; The Days Of Creating A Song, Getting It Played On The Radio, Sold Within Stores, Touring And Making A Ton Of Cash Has Basically Dried Up

» [2010-08-31] Electric Shadows Shorts Films At Beijing's Peng Hao Theatre On Sep 5th; The Disposable Film Festival Was Created In 2007 To Celebrate The Artistic Potential Of Disposable Video

» [2010-08-28] Boundless Multi-Media Series: City Inside A Broken Sky II By Kung Chi Shing; Artists From Hong Kong, The United States, Australia And Japan Share Their Life Experiences

» [2010-08-28] IDream Studios And The Day Studio Music Rose Again; Home Studios Are No More Than Computers, Digital Programs And Cheap Mics, Crammed Into Small, Acoustically "dead" Rooms

» [2010-08-27] FEYST World Tour Brings Six Malaysian Music-Makers To Shanghai World Expo 2010; The Highlight Of The Tour Includes Performances At The Expo 2010 Shanghai China In Celebration Of Malaysia's 53rd Independence

» [2010-08-26] Tomas Doncker To Play Shanghai World Expo American Pavilion; Global Soul Musician Tomas Doncker Will Perform At The American Pavilion As Part Of His "Small World" Tour

» [2010-08-25] Net Neutrality For Musicians; What's All The Fuss And Which Side Should You Be On?

» [2010-08-25] Halie Loren: Doing Jazz Her Way From Alaska To Japan; Like Many Musical Entrepreneurs, Halie Takes A Hands-on Approach To Every Aspect Of Her Career

» [2010-08-25] Time To Pay The Piper; Instead Of Campaigning And Paying Lobbyists To Advocate Their Position, The NAB Should Sit Down With The Label

» [2010-08-25] Wireless Telecommunication Market In China; The Market Potential, Communication Equipment And Telecommunication Services In China

» [2010-08-23] Industry Viewpoints: Indian Copyright Act 1958 Revisited; Perceptions On The Copyright Amendment About To Take Place In India
MusicDish Advertising Network

follow MusicDish on
Follow MusicDish on Twitter

Mi2N Music PR


Exotic Erotic Ball & Sonicbids Team-Up To Offer 2 Prime Gigs To Indie Bands


Announcing Seth Glier's "Light It Up, Let It Go" Tour Fall 2010


"A Charity Record" Released To Raise Awareness, Donations & Knowledge In The Crusade Against Abuse


DigiMusicBids.com Gives New Power To Indie Musicians


One Week Left To Enter First Ever Data-Driven Songwriting Contest From Hypebot.com


Brazilian And Latin Sounds Romance Brooklyn's Pete's Candy Store On Sept. 14th




Websites: Mi2N | MusicDish*China | MusicDish Network | MusicDishTV | Urban Music News Network
Services: Submit Article | Submit News | Submit Video | Artist Development | Premium PR Distribution

Copyright © 1997-2010 MusicDish LLC., all rights reserved.
About MusicDish e-Journal | Contact Us | Advertise | RSS | Internships