5 Myths About Music Industry Law
The purpose of this blog post is to clarify several common misconceptions about music industry law
This is a guest post written by Juan Lopez, a legal consultant at Altarboy Music. The purpose of this blog post is to clarify several common misconceptions about music industry law that are often discussed amongst musicians on the internet.
MYTH 1. Songs must be registered for the copyright to be protected
Copyright is an automatic right of the author, meaning that as soon as you make a tangible copy of a work (i.e a recording of your song or a transcript of some lyrics), then you own the copyright. Although the common practice of posting a copy of your material to yourself has nothing to do with securing copyright, it does however establish the date of when you created the work. This is very important, because should anyone later decide to use your material without permission, then you are protected, as this process is regarded as proof of when the work was written and by whom.
In the US, registering the Copyright grants you certain legal advantages (which you would be missing out on if you don't register), including the following:
1. Being able to collect compulsory license royalties
2. Being able to file infringement action for damages and injunctions; you are also able to recover attorney fees (if you win).
3. In the event of an infringement dispute in court the burden of proof is put on the party allegedly infringing your copyright.
MYTH 2. If I write the lyrics in a song I can later on take those lyrics and use them again
This is actually true in the UK, but only when the portion of the work written is sufficiently distinct and identifiable from the other parts of the co-written work with someone else.
In the event that a co-written portion of the work is not distinct from that of the other(s) all of the owners would have to agree to a request if someone wants to copy or use the work or a portion of the work of joint ownership, including the very same authors.
In the US this is not true. According to US copyright law even if two people create separate, distinct parts of a work, they each own and interest in the whole copyright, not just their contribution. For example: if two collaborators get together and one writes the lyrics and the other writes the music, either author can grant non-exclusive licenses for the entire composition (provided they pay each other their share of income) BUT neither is allowed to just pick their bit in the composition and leave the other without continuing to pay their percentage of the song.
MYTH 3. You don't need to clear a sample if it's very short
As ruled in Bridgeport Music v Dimension Films (2004) "any sampling of a master, even if it's unrecognizable is an infringement of copyright". The sample in question in this case was a two-second guitar chord with the pitch lowered and looped five times. This was all done without the owner's permission or compensation paid. The court ruled the owner of the copyright on a work had exclusive right to duplicate the work and therefore usage of any section of a work, regardless of length, would be in violation of copyright.
MYTH 4. A group's name belongs to whoever started using it first
This is only true for unregistered marks for which considerable goodwill and reputation in the market has been built in respect of the brand itself.
If someone is using your unregistered brand name you will have to show that they are trading on your reputation by passing off as you, thus causing confusion in the mind of the public 'and' diverting custom. This last part is very important because if there is no loss of income attributable to the unauthorized use the claim is likely to collapse.
Registering a trademark has, on the other hand, clear advantages as it allows you to stop any and all uses considerably quicker and cost-effectively.
MYTH 5. Being offered a five album deal by a record company means the company is committing to record and promote your next five albums
Recording agreement terms are traditionally structured in options periods. A five album deal may in reality be a five options deal (in favor of the label) in which the label gets to decide at their sole discretion whether or not to extend the Term after the end of each period for a further (option) period.
If the label does not extend the Term for a further option period then the agreement can be terminated and then you, the Artist, can be 'dropped'.
In general, recording agreements impose the smallest obligation on the label in terms of releasing albums, while keeping the option to get as much content as possible.
» The Nashville Musicians Sound Healthcare Plan Rolls Out
» Career Moves: Cinq Music, Songtrust, Def Jam, Warner Music, 117 Management & DPA
» The Production Music Association Now Accepting Entries For The 2017 Mark Awards
» Aloft Hotels And MTV Spotlight Top Asia Pacific Music Talent
» Deadline Looms - The 22nd Annual USA Songwriting Competition
Career Tips Directory
» [2017-12-06] Lithuanian Band Grabs Bronze At The Silk Road Indie Music Festival 2017; Antikvariniai Kašpirovskio Dantys Competed With Bands From Belgium, Sweden, Armenia, Germany, Japan, South Africa, India, Norway, Poland, Italy And The UK As Well As China
» [2017-12-06] Live Entertainment Specialists Headliner Launch Premium Artist Booking Service; A Fully-managed Service That Simplifies The Process Of Booking Renowned Artists And Performers For Occasional Event Planners, Agencies And Brands
» [2017-11-27] Voice-Controlled Speakers & The Music We Listen Too; Music Is A Major Part Of The Way Amazon Echo And Google Home Owners Interact With Their Devices
» [2017-11-21] Nordic & British Musicians' Unions' Joint Statement On Sexism In The Music Industry; Discussions On The Issue Of Gender Inequality, Sexism And Sexual Harassment, The Scale Of Which Had Been Highlighted By The Recent #metoo Campaign
» [2017-11-13] Women Make An Impact On The 2018 MPG Awards Shortlist; Nearly A Quarter Of Those Named This Year Are Female, Proving That Music Production Is No Longer A Bastion For The Boys
» [2017-11-13] The Nashville Musicians Sound Healthcare Plan Rolls Out; Sound Healthcare & Financial Announced The Formation Of A True Group Health Insurance Policy Plan For Musicians And Industry Professionals
» [2017-11-09] Streaming & Listening Diversity - Spotify Case Study; Will Artists Have An Easier Time Finding An Audience, Or Will Streaming Focus Global Attention On A Small Number Of Stars?
» [2017-11-09] Two-Sides Of Copyright Finance: Sound Royalties & Kobalt; Sound Royalties Unearths Millions In Undistributed Royalties While Kobalt Launches Fund To Invest In Music Copyright
» [2017-11-08] Career Moves: ROLI, Live Nation Sweden, Music Glue, BBR Music Group, Warner/Chappell Music Spain & Blue Night Soundscapes; ROLI Chief Creative Officer, Live Nation Sweden Managing Directors, Music Glue Global Head Of Business Development, BBR Music Group VP Of International, Warner/Chappell Music Spain Managing Director And Blue Night Director Of Music Clearance
» [2017-11-08] Europe's Digital Music Leaders Form Alliance; European Digital Music Companies Launch Of Digital Music Europe
» [2017-11-05] Pandora Subscriber Base Grows To Over 5 Million; Pandora Premium Paid Subscribers Cross The 1 Million Milestone In October 2017
» [2017-11-05] Hybrid Studios Announces Online Mastering Services; Engineers Billy Klein And Brian Frederick Spearhead New Online Mastering Effort Through OC Studio
follow MusicDish on