|
An open letter to Courtney, Don, Billy, Alanis, etc...
Dear Courtney,
I responded to your "open letter" in which you invited emails from those
who wanted to join you in your fight for artists' rights. I certainly
didn't expect a personal response from you, knowing how many replies
you'd get, but I did expect one of your people to answer me, or at least
an auto-response... something.
But I did not to hear from anyone.
I have been working for over 12 years to organize the independent
musicians in this country, to face the very issues you have brought the
spotlight upon with your celebrity status. I am thrilled that you want
to help, but please do not forget the majority of the musicians in the
US, that is to say; the INDIES.
To you, Don, Billy, Alanis and others, we thank you for your awesome
efforts, but please don't ignore us. We are the majority, and we don't
have Lawyers, Managers, Publicists, Promoters and Producers to help us
succeed. We struggle to survive, in "Do It Yourself" mode, in order to
keep chasing the dream that consumes us, in order to keep doing what we
have to do, regardless of the difficulty. We are artists, just like you,
and you were once just like us too, remember?
The majority is a silent one, but not by choice. Rather, they are a
silent majority because they are far overshadowed by their much more
visible and notable colleagues, the few who have managed to beat the
unbelievable odds and actually achieve great success as an artist. They
are also overshadowed by the industry that preys upon them, kept in the
dark and given as little support as possible. "Just keep crankin' out
those tunes, we'll market 'em and make lots of money off of 'em." How
many artists see a reasonable amount of the profits earned off of their
creative labors?
Again, just as I witnessed at Georgetown University not so long ago, in
the recent Senate Judiciary Hearings, the "musicians" are being
represented by Don Henley, Alanis Morissette, and others whose level of
success does not typify that of the average struggling musician who has
no record label deal. Artists' rights need to apply to all artists, not
just a select few. Whether or not a musician has achieved great
financial success, or is in a recording contract, or has a Manager or a
Lawyer, they should still receive a fair percentage of any profits
gained from their works.
The music industry is at a crossroads, and artists such as yourselves,
who have achieved a position of power through financial and promotional
success, can have a very positive effect on the reshaping of this
business. I ask you now, please seek out those who are in touch with the
silent majority, seek out the musicians who struggle daily, and help
them make their voices be heard. If you do so, all musicians will
benefit, not just a select few.
Alanis, we love you, but if you had spoken to me, or any number of indie
artists before you went to Washington, you may not have said "my initial
resistance to the new services created online was based on the debate
having been framed in terms of "piracy." But what I have since come to
realize is that for the majority of artists, this so-called "piracy" may
have actually been working in their favor."
I don't think your realization is accurate, I do not believe that the
majority agrees with you Alanis. The reality is that the majority of
"recording artists" press on the average, about a thousand CDs, and then
struggle to sell them at $5 or $10 each, from stage, on the internet, in
supportive retail stores and on the subway going to their "day gig' if
they can. The thought of losing one of the only concrete revenue sources
they have terrifies most indies.
Artists like you, who have reached such a level of success, can truly
help these people because you can get the powers that be to sit up and
listen to you! When you said, "Most recording artists never receive
royalties past their initial advance due to the financial structure of
most record company contracts..." you totally overlooked the vast
majority of recording artists, the ones who DON'T have a contract. Many
of them do not want one.
When you continued with, "From these artists' viewpoint, their music is
free since they do not, in the end, receive money from any of the sales.
That "free" internet distribution allows the artist to aggregate an
audience and create a direct relationship with that audience as well as
develop a community among the people who love their music. This in turn
allows that artist to generate compensation through other outlets such
as touring and merchandise. For the majority of artists, this amounts to
making enough money to be in survival mode." you were off the mark. See
my article on this very subject entitled "Consensus Amongst Indies" which illustrates that
it is widely agreed by the majority of those indies I interviewed that
they simply can NOT survive on gigs and merch sales alone. Most indies
get paid very little if at all, to perform, and none of them make any
real profit off of selling bric-a-brac.
To all of the powerful artists out there, please use your clout to help
your fellow musician community as a whole. The entire range of musicians
need to be represented, and they need to be heard now, while these
issues are in the malleable state, or Pete Townsend will be singing again:
"I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss"
Don't let another important policy making event happen without an effort
to see that equal representation is present, and that the silent
majority need not be silent any longer.
Thank you for listening, and for your help at this critical time for
artists' rights.
Related MusicDish e-Journal Articles: » Consensus Amongst Indies (2001-03-25) » Reply to Ramos' Consensus Amongst Indies (2001-04-03) » Reply to the Reply to Ramos' Consensus Amongst Indies (2001-04-09)
back
| top

|
Insider Scoop
» How The Music Industry Changed
» iDream Studios And The Day Studio Music Rose Again
» Net Neutrality For Musicians
» Time To Pay the Piper
» Industry Viewpoints: Indian Copyright Act 1958 Revisited
Insider Scoop Directory
» [2010-09-01] NY Times Covers AES NY Section's Electric Lady Studios 40th Anniversary Salute; Over Eighty Music Industry Pro's Were In Attendance, And Thousands Of Viewers Witnessed The Two-hour+ Event
» [2010-09-01] How The Music Industry Changed; The Days Of Creating A Song, Getting It Played On The Radio, Sold Within Stores, Touring And Making A Ton Of Cash Has Basically Dried Up
» [2010-08-31] Electric Shadows Shorts Films At Beijing's Peng Hao Theatre On Sep 5th; The Disposable Film Festival Was Created In 2007 To Celebrate The Artistic Potential Of Disposable Video
» [2010-08-28] Boundless Multi-Media Series: City Inside A Broken Sky II By Kung Chi Shing; Artists From Hong Kong, The United States, Australia And Japan Share Their Life Experiences
» [2010-08-28] IDream Studios And The Day Studio Music Rose Again; Home Studios Are No More Than Computers, Digital Programs And Cheap Mics, Crammed Into Small, Acoustically "dead" Rooms
» [2010-08-27] FEYST World Tour Brings Six Malaysian Music-Makers To Shanghai World Expo 2010; The Highlight Of The Tour Includes Performances At The Expo 2010 Shanghai China In Celebration Of Malaysia's 53rd Independence
» [2010-08-26] Tomas Doncker To Play Shanghai World Expo American Pavilion; Global Soul Musician Tomas Doncker Will Perform At The American Pavilion As Part Of His "Small World" Tour
» [2010-08-25] Net Neutrality For Musicians; What's All The Fuss And Which Side Should You Be On?
» [2010-08-25] Halie Loren: Doing Jazz Her Way From Alaska To Japan; Like Many Musical Entrepreneurs, Halie Takes A Hands-on Approach To Every Aspect Of Her Career
» [2010-08-25] Time To Pay The Piper; Instead Of Campaigning And Paying Lobbyists To Advocate Their Position, The NAB Should Sit Down With The Label
» [2010-08-25] Wireless Telecommunication Market In China; The Market Potential, Communication Equipment And Telecommunication Services In China
» [2010-08-23] Industry Viewpoints: Indian Copyright Act 1958 Revisited; Perceptions On The Copyright Amendment About To Take Place In India
|
|
follow MusicDish on
|