Spanish Broadcasting sues Clear Channel and HBC
Music Industry News - as it happens
Source: Mi2N - June 13, 2002
Claims that Clear Channel adversely affected the ability of America's
largest Hispanic-owned radio operator SBS (Spanish Broadcasting System) to
raise capital, depressed its share price, impugned the reputation of SBS,
made station acquisitions more difficult and interfered with SBS's business
opportunities and contractual arrangements, are false, says Clear Channel
CEO Lowry Mays.
SBS is suing Clear Channel Communications and Hispanic Broadcasting
Corporation alleging federal and state antitrust law violations and other
state law claims.
Clear Channel, the largest radio company in the US, is the principal
shareholder in HBC, which is in turn the largest Spanish-language radio
owner/operator in the Continental US.
Clear Channel and HBC allegedly took these steps to facilitate its ultimate
objective of acquiring SBS and eliminating it as a competitive threat to
HBC's, "attempted dominance of the top 10 Spanish-language radio markets",
claims the lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District
In a statement, SBS says:
* In the summer of 1999, when SBS's initial public offering was being
readied for market, Randall Mays, Clear Channel's Chief Financial Officer,
called two of SBS's lead underwriters to attempt to get them to withdraw
from the offering.
* After the initial public offering, Clear Channel and HBC sought to depress
the SBS stock price by limiting or eliminating coverage by leading
securities analysts through similar, continuing threats to withhold Clear
Channel and/or HBC business from the analysts' employers.
* Clear Channel and HBC improperly induced significant institutional
investors to divest their positions in SBS, depressing SBS's stock price.
* Clear Channel and HBC attempted to keep SBS from acquiring radio stations,
engaged in bidding wars solely for the purpose of increasing SBS's costs in
acquiring those stations and tortuously interfered with transactions under
* Clear Channel and HBC attempted to injure SBS by inducing employees under
contract to SBS to breach their contracts and work for Clear Channel and/or
* Clear Channel injured SBS by inducing Katz Hispanic Media to breach its
long-term contract as SBS's national sales representative in order to become
HBC's national sales representative.
* Clear Channel has "parked" stations that it owns with other companies in
order to circumvent Federal Communications Commission ownership limitations.
This practice recently lead Congressman Howard Berman to seek Department of
Justice and FCC investigations and House Judiciary Committee hearings on
* The involvement of Clear Channel in the foregoing demonstrates that it has
acted and continues to act for, and has controlled and is controlling, HBC
in a manner that is inconsistent with representations made by it to the FCC
concerning its ownership interest in HBC.
* Clear Channel has leveraged its market power in radio and other areas of
commerce (including venue promotion, advertising and outdoor displays) to
benefit Clear Channel and HBC and to harm SBS.
"These charges are false and we will, as we always do with frivolous
lawsuits, fight vehemently to defend our position and we have every
expectation of wining on all counts. The charge that Clear Channel
interfered with SBS's ability to compete fairly is absurd and unfounded,"
Related News from Mi2N:
» Clear Channel Responds To SBS's Allegations