Metallica the Monopolist
I found Tom White's comment to be right on point, which should concern us all.
"The most obvious reason for not wanting to sell singles: when you buy a single, the artist gets only 1/12 or so of what he/she would make when you buy an album. If you thought that only one or two songs on your album were marketable, would you want to unbundle them?"
Bundling is done for several reason: the goods are complementary (razor/blade), bundling provides additional efficiencies such as in marketing/retail,... The reason you provide, if I may paraphrase, is "I've produced a crappy set of products, of which only 20% are profitable in the market. So to ensure profitability, I'll bundle the crap with the good, forcing the consumer to pay for the 80% they don't really want."
By itself, there is nothing wrong with this, though it would most likely turn into a business blunder as competitors offered an unbundled set of goods that reflects what consumers want. This would force the producer to themselves unbundle in order to remain competitive, though they may continue to offer the bundled set as well.
MusicDish Network Advertisement|
And therein lies the problem with bundling and the music business. An entrepreneur cannot unbundle Metallica's album without their permission, even where it to make business sense. Metallica's 'monopoly' over its works allows it to impose the more costly product on consumers without the competitive check that regulates most other markets. In economic terms, Metallica is a monopolist using its market power to impose a bundled product and reap supra-competitive rents.
Nor is it clear that Metallica's strategy is profit-maximizing. By forcing a bundled version of the good at a given price, the band is in fact restricting its customer base, rejecting those willing to purchase selected singles or unable to afford the full album. The situation is exacerbated by the free availability of these same tracks on file sharing systems. Metallica is practically begging their fans to go to Kazaa.
Alternatively, Metallica could broaden its market base to include non-album purchasers. Consumers purchasing the full album could be provided a bonus in order for singles not to cannibalize on album revenue, while those singles could be priced at a premium ($1.50 versus ¢99), reflecting the consumers desire for flexibility. Offering singles would not only enlarge buying customers among Metallica fans, but newcomers intrigued by the buzz and wishing to 'sample' their music. Incorporating these otherwise forgotten consumers may also lead to increased ancillary revenues such as merchandising and concert ticket sales.
While it may seem unfair to many Metallica fans, it is clearly within Metallica's right. Now if Metallica's label, Elektra Records, were to make individual songs available exclusively (or on a preferential basis) to firms affiliated with its parent AOL/TW while imposing the bundled album on unaffiliated companies, that would be another story.
» indieOn Connects Music to the Blockchain
» 13 Music Label Sold to MTN
» Darcus Beese Named President Of Island Records
» ASCAP Revenues Top $1.144 Billion In 2017
» BMG Appoints New Creative Directors In Nashville
News Beat Directory
» [2018-09-16] Live Nation Electronic Asia Inks Deal With Budweiser For Creamfields Festivals; Together, Creamfields And Budweiser Will Focus On Building Entirely New Content For Dedicated Electronic Music Fans Throughout Asia
» [2018-08-23] Andy Ma Appointed Warner Music China CEO; Andy Ma Has Also Been Appointed EVP, Commercial And Business Development For Greater China
» [2018-08-23] IndieOn Connects Music To The Blockchain; IndieOn Is Confident Of Creating A "music Miner" Who Listens More And Grow Their Token Value
» [2018-06-23] The 2018 MIDEM Silk Road International Music Alliance Signing; International Music Industries Signing Of A Mutual Resource Sharing Agreement With Shanghai Conservatory Of Music & The China Records Group
» [2018-06-06] Screen Music Connect To Explore The Music Of Film, Television And Interactive Media; Created By James Hannigan, Award-winning Composer And Game Music Connect Co-founder, Screen Music Connect Builds On The Success Of The Sold-out Game Music Conferences
» [2018-06-05] Fred Casimir To Develop BMG's Global Recordings Business; As Well As Building BMG's European Infrastructure, Casimir Was Instrumental In Developing BMG's Recordings Business
» [2018-06-03] 13 Music Label Sold To MTN; DSN Music Spins Off Record Label To Albuquerque Music Entrepreneur's New Group
» [2018-06-02] CISAC 2018 Annual Report; A Comprehensive Overview Of The Confederation's Work To Serve 4 Million Creators And 239 Authors Societies Across The World
» [2018-06-02] MusicDish Announces A Love Electric 2018 China Tour; The Tour Will Crisscross Through China With 12 Shows In 8 Cities, Including Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhuhai, Shenzhen, Kunming, Jiaxin, Wuhan And Beijing
» [2018-06-02] Darcus Beese Named President Of Island Records; Renowned U.K. Music Executive To Join Universal Music Group's U.S. Label Leadership
» [2018-05-17] Avant-Garde Label Maybe Noise Launches In Beijing; The Official Launch Will Be On May 26 At Magnet Theater With A Performance Supporting Its First Vinyl Release: Píng Zè
» [2018-05-04] Award-Winning Lithuanian Rock Band Colours Of Bubbles "She Is The Darkness" 2018 China Tour; The Tour Will Kickoff In Shanghai Where The Band Will Represent Lithuania During The Country's Signing To The Silk Road Music Alliance
follow MusicDish on